#033: Nanook Of The North



The popularity of documentaries is often dogged by controversy over the veracity of its contents, which then often leads to a discussion on just what truth is when it comes to documentary films: is it recording truth to turn on a camera and not interfere, especially when science now tells us that observing is interfering? And what of the process of filming something and then editing and arrange that film into a narrative?  The controversy rages on, decades after the success of Robert J. Flaherty’s “ethnographic” films, including this box-office smash, gave audiences a glimpse into ways of life that Flaherty, for the most part, invented for the camera.

Listen to the podcast episode here:  PODCAST

My review of the film on my blog:  REVIEW

NEXT CRITERION: #032 Oliver Twist

PREVIOUS CRITERION: #034 Andrei Rublev

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.